Texas Senate Approves $16.5 Billion Property Tax Relief Package

“If for any reason the state is unable or unwilling to pay … it will be a starvation for our public education system,” Eckhardt said.

By pointing out that Texas’ economy is booming and that voters will ultimately decide the measure, which will be put on the ballot as a proposed constitutional amendment, Bettencourt attempted to ease that skepticism.

“I can’t disagree that someday there will be a crisis, but we made this commitment,” Bettencourt said. “We have to stand by it.”

SB 4 uses the recapture program, “Robin Hood,” to lower property-wealthy districts’ payments. The program requires those districts to give any tax surplus to the state for “property-poor” neighborhoods that can’t raise enough money through taxes. The Austin Independent School District paid the state nearly $800 million in recapture payments last fiscal year.

You can also consider the following:

• • State Senator Introduces Educational Freedom’ Bill To Empower Texas Parents
  • Texas National Guard Members Stand To Benefit From New Bill
  • Texas Teen Faces 45-Year Prison Sentence For Shocking Uber Eats Murder

Austin ISD chief financial officer Ed Ramos expects property values to grow faster than the state average. SB 4 would require the district to lower its property tax rate for maintenance and operations. Ramos said the state would cover the district’s shortfall and lower the tax rate, reducing Robin Hood payments. Austin ISD would receive no new funds from a lower tax rate.

“It’s basically a flat effect for school districts,” Ramos said. “There’s no new money for us with this bill. But what it does is … lower property taxes throughout the state.”

Ramos’ only concern is that if the state spends so much to cover the bill’s shortfall, lawmakers may not have enough surplus to raise state funds for districts, which they say are desperately needed after the COVID-19 pandemic and rising inflation. Since lawmakers overhauled the school finance system in 2019, the basic allotment, $6,160 per student, has not increased.

“When the state is looking at its $32 billion surplus, if about half of that is going to be taken because of property tax compression, what is left for other needs of the state?” he said.

Chandra Villanueva, director of policy and advocacy for the progressive think tank Every Texan, said the bill would benefit businesses and the wealthiest Texans while providing no new funds for school districts.

She called it a costly tax break.

She thinks the state’s model is unsustainable. The state will cover district shortfalls if the bill passes. While it can cover the difference now, the state’s share will increase with no guarantee of a surplus to help pay the bill.

“The only reason we have a lot of this revenue right now is because of inflation and its impact on tax collections,” she said. “It’s not something that we can be guaranteed to grow and be sustainable. What we’re doing is setting up our schools for future cuts.”

State Sen. Tan Parker, a Republican from Flower Mound, also passed Senate Bill 5, which would cut $1.5 billion in business property taxes. Voters will likely support the Senate tax proposals to raise the homestead exemption and cut business property taxes.

25NewsKXXV tweeted that Texas Senate passed a $16.5 billion package to lower property taxes. You can see below:

Texas Senate passes $16.5 billion package to lower property taxes https://t.co/9hrNFwPkA3 pic.twitter.com/XtZhdSCptc

— 25NewsKXXV (@25NewsKXXV) March 22, 2023

The Senate proposals now go to the House, where lawmakers have taken a different approach to property tax reduction. Like the Senate, House budget writers want to lower property taxes with at least $5.3 billion from the state surplus.

The House’s main tax cut plan cuts school property taxes by $12 billion. The proposal’s most controversial element would tighten a cap on how much a homeowner’s primary residence taxed by school districts can rise yearly, which Patrick and Bettencourt, tax cut advocates, and business lobbying groups oppose.

The bill would lower the state’s “appraisal cap” from 10% to 5% and beneficial owners of grocery stores, apartment complexes, and restaurants. Tax experts say doing so would unfairly give longer-term property owners more significant tax breaks.

Experts say lowering the appraisal cap wouldn’t lower tax bills because cities and school districts could raise taxes to compensate for lost funds. On Monday, the House Ways and Means Committee approved the bill 10-1, with Grand Prairie Democrat Chris Turner voting no.

If you liked reading this article, follow us on our website, kerrvillebreakingnews.com, for more updates.